Vietnam’s automobile industry’s development policies are erroneous
"The
biggest problems of policy makers are that they cannot explain their decisions
and they dare not take responsibility for their policies”, said Vo Tri Thanh,
Deputy Head of the Central Institute for Economic Management (CIEM).
In early
October 2010, the Ministry of Finance (MOF) proposed to slash the import
tariffs on trucks. The proposal has immediately faced the strong opposition
from domestic automobile manufacturers.
The
manufacturers have warned that the proposed import tariff changes would force
them to shut down production and go bankrupt.
MOF says
the current import tariffs on trucks are overly high (80 percent on
less-than-five-ton trucks and 54-55 percent on 6-10-ton trucks). Trucks are
considered the main production tool for cargo transport companies.
The story
has once again stirred up the public’s prolonged debate about Vietnam’s
automobile industry’s development strategy. Many people believe that Vietnam
made a mistake when deciding to develop the automobile industry based on the
local production protection mechanism.
Dr Vo Tri
Thanh, Deputy Head of CIEM
In order
to successfully develop an automobile industry, it is necessary to satisfy two
factors: big production and market scales (if not, it will be impossible to
develop supporting industries), and the technology transfer, which only occurs
through competition and association.
However,
Vietnam still lacks both factors.
We have
been trying to develop the automobile industry based on protection of local
production policies.
Vietnam
has been puzzled during the process of building up the market, opening the
market, installing barriers to protect local production, in trade liberalization,
and domestic economic reform.
The
reality shows that our strategy for the development of the automobile is
flawed. This should be seen as a lesson in the development process. However, by
speaking so, I don’t mean that we must put an end to our ambitions to develop
automobile industry. There are other solutions which allow us to make changes
to develop the industry.
I would
like to emphasize that in order to minimize the costs we have to pay for
adjustments in policies, we have to maximize transparency, the predictability
of policies and we must give a certain time period for adjustments.
Policy
makers must have good explanations for their decisions. All the proposals and
petitions by enterprises must be addressed by policy makers.
The biggest
problems of policy makers are that they cannot explain their decisions and they
dare not take responsibility for their policies.
Dr Tran
Huu Huynh, Head of the Legal Department of the Vietnam Chamber of Commerce and
Industry
The story
here is that it is necessary to find the answer to the question if Vietnam
needs to have the whole automobile industry, or does it only need to develop a
certain branch of the automobile industry?
In order
to find out the answer, we need to consider if our products can be competitive
in the regional and international markets. We should learn lessons from the
electronics industry. Sony has decided to scale down production and leave
Vietnam.
Vietnam
has experienced a decade of trying to develop its automobile industry. However,
to date Vietnam still does not have its automobile industry. It only has the
automobile assembling industry.
We should
also look into other neighboring countries. They are more competitive than us,
they have the state’s determination, good infrastructure and better supporting
industries. However, they still cannot develop automobile industries of their
own.
Our
automobile industry could not develop even when the local production was well
protected in the past. Meanwhile, the protection of local production will have
to be loosened because we need to hold our commitment of opening the market.
If we
draw the conclusion that we need to adjust policies, we need to foresee how the
adjustments will affect investors, their business plans and jobs. We need to
give support to those who will be hurt by the policy adjustments.
Minister
of Finance Vu Van Ninh
In the
past, we once applied a mechanism to encourage product localization . However,
the mechanism was not successful. We wanted to have an automobile industry, not
an automobile assembling industry.
Our tax
policies were all thoroughly considered before they were promulgated. When
drafting regulations policy makers not only had to consider local production
and domestic conditions, but they also had to consider to our commitments to
international treaties.
Regarding
the opinion that the tax policies will kill domestic production, I do not
totally agree with that. It still depends on the products. For example, the tax
policies will still be reasonable to protect the products which Vietnam can
manufacture with high quality.
The
Ministry of Finance has requested the Ministry of Industry and Trade to join
forces to have a review on the issue. However, it is really a complicated issue.